Hill v. Rectenwald et al
ORDER ADOPTING 173 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting 144 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Hughes, Jeffrey Ewell and dismissing these defts from plaintiff's complaint; denying pltf's motion for summary judgment in part, with respect to his allegations against defts Ewell and Hughes; ruling on pltf's summary judgment with respect to deft Rectenwald is held in abeyance, pending defts' response. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/13/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DR. ROBERT RECTENWALD, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings
and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by
Defendants Hughes and Ewell (Doc. No. 144) is GRANTED, and they are DISMISSED from
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
168) is DENIED in part, with respect to his allegations against Defendants Ewell and Hughes;
ruling on Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Motion with respect to Defendant Rectenwald is held
in abeyance, pending Defendants’ Response.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of April, 2011.
JAMES M. MOODY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?