Hill v. Rectenwald et al
ORDER adopting 45 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; granting in part 33 Motion to Dismiss with respect the plaintiff's allegations against defendants Kelly, Gibson and White and denying with respect to plaintiff's allegations of failure to protect against defendants Ewell and Hughes. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/28/2010. (thd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JESSIE HILL, ADC #104136 v. 5 : 1 0 C V 0 0 0 3 0 J M M / J TK DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Kelley, Gibson, Ewell, Hughes, and White, is GRANTED in part, with respect to plaintiff's allegations against defendants Kelley, Gibson, and White, and DENIED with respect to plaintiff's allegations of failure to protect against defendants Ewell and Hughes. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of June, 2010. PLAINTIFF
DR. ROBERT RECTENWALD, et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?