Patrick v. Norris
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the District Court dismiss 1 Petitioner Eddie Lee Patrick Jr.'s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eddie Lee Patrick, Jr Objections to R&R due no later than 14 days from the date on the Recommended Disposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/26/10. (hph)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS P I N E BLUFF DIVISION E D D I E LEE PATRICK, JR. A D C # 94049 V S. NO. 5:10CV00035-JLH-BD PETITIONER
L A R R Y NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
R ESPON D EN T
R E C O M M E N D E D DISPOSITION I. P r o c e d u r e for Filing Objections T h e following recommended disposition has been sent to Chief United States D is tric t J. Leon Holmes. Any party may file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the o b je c tio n . If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the e v id e n c e that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must b e received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (1 4 ) days from the date on the Recommended Disposition. A copy will be furnished to th e opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to a p p e a l questions of fact.
Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to: C le rk , United States District Court E a s te rn District of Arkansas 6 0 0 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 L ittle Rock, AR 72201-3325 II. B a c k g r o u n d and Discussion P e titio n e r, Eddie Lee Patrick, Jr., is serving a 480-month sentence in the Arkansas D e p a rtm e n t of Correction ("ADC") for terroristic threatening and rape. On February 5, 2 0 1 0 , Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1) u n d e r 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming he was denied a fair trial and effective assistance of c o u n s e l during his April, 2003 trial in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Arkansas. (#1 at pp. 5-6) On October 8, 2009, this Court entered an order dismissing, with prejudice, all of P e titio n e r's claims in a petition for writ of habeas corpus he filed on November 5, 2008, c h a lle n g in g the same conviction and sentence he challenges in the instant petition. This C o u rt dismissed the petition on the grounds that all of the claims were barred by the s ta tu te of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). See Patrick v. State of Arknsas, N o . 5:08cv00295-BD (E.D. Ark. filed Nov. 5, 2008). R u le 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District C o u rts authorizes a district court to summarily dismiss a habeas corpus petition prior to an
answer or other responsive pleading.1 Summary dismissal is appropriate under Rule 4 w h e re the face of the petition and the court records, of which a federal district court can ta k e judicial notice, indicate that the petition is a second or successive petition filed w ith o u t authorization from the appropriate court of appeals. Blackmon v. Armontrout, 61 F e d .A p p x . 985, 985 (8th Cir. 2003). Before filing a second or successive habeas application in district court under § 2254, a petitioner is required to move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order a u th o riz in g the district court to consider the application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Without an order from the circuit court authorizing the filing of a second or successive h a b e a s application, a district court does not have jurisdiction to hear the petition. Burton v . Stewart, 549 U.S. 147, 153, 157 (2007) (per curiam). F ro m the face of the instant habeas petition and the court records, it plainly a p p e a rs that this petition is a second or successive habeas application. Petitioner a p p a re n tly has not obtained authorization from the Eighth Circuit to file a second or s u c c e s s iv e habeas petition. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the p e titio n .
Rule 4 provides: "The clerk must promptly forward the petition to a judge under th e court's assignment procedure, and the judge must promptly examine it. If it plainly a p p e a rs from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to re lie f in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify th e petitioner." 3
C o n c lu s io n T h e Court recommends that the District Court DISMISS Petitioner Eddie Lee
P a tric k Jr.'s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction, p u rs u a n t to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. D A T E D this 26th day of February, 2010.
___________________________________ U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?