Lybrand v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 33

ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 21 Motion to Strike without prejudice to re-file following the completion of discovery. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/28/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION F. MIKE LYBRAND VS. PLAINTIFF NO. 5:10CV00045 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Pending are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, docket # 14, and Plaintiff’s motion to strike expert testimony, docket # 21. Since these filings, the Court has entered an amended scheduling order re-setting this matter for trial and extending the parties time in which to complete discovery. The new motions deadline is February 15, 2012. Because the facts and evidence may be developed further, the Court denies the pending motions, without prejudice to re-file following the completion of discovery. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2011. __________________________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?