Grissom v. Hobbs

Filing 22

ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, the habeas petition 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; a certificate of appealability is denied; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/6/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Grissom v. Hobbs Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WESLEY ELISHA GRISSOM ADC #110265 VS. CASE NO.: 5:10CV00050 SWW/BD RESPONDENT PETITIONER RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction ORDER The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety. Accordingly, Petitioner Wesley Elisha Grissom's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED with prejudice. When entering a final order adverse to Petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court. A certificate of appealability may issue only if Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, Petitioner has not provided the basis for issuance of a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of October, 2010. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?