Toney v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 65

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to a settlement reached by the parties. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/30/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARCUS TONEY v. PLAINTIFF 5:10CV00054 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that the complaint and all claims against this Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. The pending motions are moot. (DE #21, 25, 27, 53, 54 and 60). The Court retains complete jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. If the parties desire any settlement agreement be made a part of the record herein, they are directed to reduce it to writing and file it with the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2011. ___________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?