Toney v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
65
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to a settlement reached by the parties. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/30/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MARCUS TONEY
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:10CV00054
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds
that the complaint and all claims against this Defendant are dismissed with prejudice.
The pending motions are moot. (DE #21, 25, 27, 53, 54 and 60).
The Court retains complete jurisdiction for sixty (60) days to vacate this order and
to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and
further litigation is necessary. If the parties desire any settlement agreement be made a
part of the record herein, they are directed to reduce it to writing and file it with the Court
within sixty (60) days of the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2011.
___________________________
James M. Moody
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?