Ransom v. Hobbs

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 denying certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/15/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Ransom v. Hobbs Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION AMOS RANSOM VS. CASE NO. 5:10CV00088 BSM/HDY PETITIONER RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction ORDER RESPONDENT The proposed findings and recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the findings and recommendations are approved and adopted in their entirety. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, a court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case there is no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2010. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?