Dunlap v. Hobbs
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 and dismissing this case with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/21/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL D. DUNLAP
ADC #114705
VS.
PETITIONER
5:10CV00136 JMM/JTR
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the objections filed
by Petitioner. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo
review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,
under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (docket entry #1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED,
WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Certificate of
Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254
Cases.
Dated this 21st day of May, 2012.
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?