Dunlap v. Hobbs

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 and dismissing this case with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/21/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL D. DUNLAP ADC #114705 VS. PETITIONER 5:10CV00136 JMM/JTR RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the objections filed by Petitioner. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (docket entry #1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Dated this 21st day of May, 2012. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?