Scott v. Redus et al
Filing
33
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/13/11. (kpr)
FILED
u.s. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS
IN THE UMfEJ) STATES DISTRICf COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICf OF' ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
APR 13 2011
JAM
By:~,..,..~s...tiiI...u:;~=-=-=-_
DEPCLERK
WALTER SCOlT, JR.
PLAINTIFF
v.
CASE NO. 5:1o..CV...{)138 JMM
MAYOR CARL A. REDUS, In His Official Capacity
As Mayor for the CIty of Pine Blair; CITY OF PINE
BLvnr,· A Manlcipal Corporation and Public Body
Corporate and PolitiC; BRENDA DA~ONES, 10 Ber
Oftlclal Capacity as ChlefofPoUee, Pine Blutt
Pol~ Department; JOHN HOWELL, In His Individual
And Otr'ldal Capacity as former Chief of Police, Pine
BlofT Pollee Department; AHMAD PACE, In His
Individual and Offidal Capacity as a Police Officer for the
City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas; PJ'S DISCO PRIVATE CLUB
DEFENDANTS
AGREED PROTECfIVE ORDER
Plaintiff has requested discovery of records contahting sensitivepersoo8J information. In
order to pennit Plaintiff adequate access to the records necessary to completely present this case
. herein, and, at the same time to address priVIW)' concerns, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED
and DECREED as follows:
l.
AInn~
Plaintiff has made discovery requests fur copies of the persoone] files upon
Pace (personal infonnatioD sucb as addresses and social security nwnbers win be
redacted). In addition, Plaintiff has requested aU complaints and internal affidrs docwnents
regarding Ahmad Pace. The parties have agreed that due to the private and sensitive nature of
these documents. a protective
oroer should be entered before these documents are provided to
Plaintiff.
1
2.
Any docwncnts produced in response to discovery requests as provided in
Paragraph I above shall be considered confidential;
3.
AU confidential records or other infonnation provided hereunder shall be
used for the purpose of this litigation and none of the confidential material may be used for any
other purpose whatsoever without a new request for the material. Moreover. neither Plaintift;
Defendants, or their counsel may utilize directly or indirectly the confidential records,
documents, or other information made available pursuant
to this Order in
any other
administrative complaint, proceeding, or civil action without a new request;
4.
All confidential
reco~
docwnents, tapes, or other infonnation provided
heceunder shall be retained in the custody of the Plaintitrs or Defendants' counsel including
their paralegal, sec:retarial staff. andlor other staff members. during the pendency of this
litigation. Plaintiff's and Defimdants' counsel may also provide copies of such confidential
records, documents or other information to any expert wimcss[es] retained by the Plaintiff or
Defendant or persons frequently employed by such expert(s] whose review of the material is
necessary for the Plaintiff's and Defendants· prosecution in 1his litigation;
5.
If .confidential documents or records are used during depositions, the
depositions shall be treated as confidential in accordance with this Order;
6.
Any
document.
information
or deposition
designated
as
confidential
under this Order shall. when filed with the Court, be clearly maIked confidential, scaled, placed
in separate, secure storage by the Clerk, and opened only by authorized Court personnel;
7.
Plaintiff. Defendants, their respective counsel and their staff and the retained
expert witnesslwitnesses shall not in any mumer. directly transfer confidential records.
2
documents or other information provided hereunder or copies thereof, or communicate. orally or
in writing, any ofthe data contained in said material to any person;
8.
Plaintifi's counsel, and Defendants' counsel promptly upon completion of this
litigation, or before if at such time they have no further use of the confidential infonnation.
whichever shall first occur, shall return to the Defendant and Plaintiff all materials produced, and
aU copies and extracts of data from such materials;
9.
This Protective Order shall govern all pre-trial proceedings. but shall be subject to
modification either before, during or aftec the trial on the merits, upon application of any of the
parties to this lawsuit and for good cause shown;
10.
The provisions of this Order shall not affect the admissibility ofevidence
at trial or any preliminary evidentiary proceeding in open court, except as directed by separate
Order oftbis Court; and
11.
This Order is without prejudice to the rights ofany party to make objections to the
discovery as permitted by the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, or by any statute or other
authority.
IT IS SO ORDERED TIllS
\~ DAYOF~
norable Iames M. Moody
United States District Court
By:
yM.
Attorney
r
P.O. Box
North Little Rock, AR 72115
TELEPHONE: 501-978-6117
FACS~:SOl-537-7267
BMAlL: tdemtis@.armI.org
3
,2011.
And
By:
w ~0'1().
°&QaJ
Willard Proctor. Jr.
Attomey ror Plaintiff
2100 Wolfe Street
Little Rock, AR 72202-6258
TELEPHONE: 501-374-9156
FAJ(:501-325-4959
EMAD..: wprocto(ir@aol.CQgl
And
By:
..,....-------
M. Keith Wren and Associates
Attomey for John Howell
942) W. Marlcham St.• Suite B
Little Rock, ArlaInsas. 72205
Telephone No. 501-223-9736
Fax No. 501-228-8887
Email: mkwren@aoI.com
And
BY:-«
C-~~.
Taylor (rAJ C:~c..~J\.,
Attome)Sfor PI's Disco &; Night Club
Brockman. Norton &. Taylor
501 East Eighth Avenue
Post Office Box 8967
Pine Bluff, AR 71611-8967
Telephone: 87Q-S34-2SSt
FAX: 870-534-1696
Email: bntlawfinn@gmai1.00m,
4
And
By:
_
Willard Proctor, Jr.
Attorney for Plaintiff
2100 Wolfe Street
Little Rock, AR 72202-6258
TELEPHONE: 501-374-9156
FAX: 501·325-4959
EMAIL: wproctorjr@aol.com
And
By:
m~
M. Keith Wren and Associates
Attorney for John Howell
9421 W. Markham St., Suite B
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Telephone No. 501-223-9736
Fax No. 501-228-8887
Email: mkwren@aol.com
And
By:
_
Zachary Taylor
Attorney for PJ's Disco & Night Club
Brockman, Norton & Taylor
501 East Eighth Avenue
Post Office Box 8967
Pine Bluff, AR 7161 1-8967
Telephone: 870-534-2551
FAX: 870-534-1696
Email: bntlawtirm(a).gmail.com
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?