Guinther v. Banks et al
ORDER ADOPTING 83 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 71 Motion for TRO, Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Edgar L Guinther. The Clerk is directed to provide the Plaintiff with a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/15/10. (bkp)
-JTR Guinther v. Banks et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION EDGAR L. GUINTHER ADC #100017 V. JAMES BANKS, Former Warden, Tucker Unit, et al. ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The Court notes Plaintiff's complaints about his failure to receive documents filed in his case. However, the documents that Plaintiff says he has not received are either pleadings that Plaintiff has filed with the Court or certificates of mailing by the Court Clerk. The Clerk is directed to provide the Plaintiff with a copy of the docket in this case so that he can be assured he has received all of the pertinent documents. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. DENIED. 2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis Plaintiff's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (docket entry #71) is 5:10CV00139 JMM/JTR DEFENDANTS
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 15th day of December, 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?