Heffernan v. Harris et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 3 12 are DENIED as moot; defts' 15 Motion to Dismiss, which the Court construes as a Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/22/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Heffernan v. Harris et al Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ROBERT HEFFERNAN, ADC #76641 v. No. 5:10CV00147 JLH-JJV DEFENDANTS ORDE R The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT: 1) as moot. 2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, which this Court construes as a Motion for Summary Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (Doc. Nos. 3, 12) are DENIED PLAINTIFF GRANT HARRIS, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED. 3) Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2010. __________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?