Davis v. Norris et al

Filing 10

ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous; this dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/17/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CHARLES RANDALL DAVIS ADC #84756 v. LARRY NORRIS, et al. ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully NO: 5:10CV00155 JLH DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of June, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?