Garner v. Lay
ORDER if Petitioner wishes to reply to 7 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Ray Hobbs, he must do so on or before 8/6/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/7/10. (vjt)
Garner v. Hobbs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
FRANK R. GARNER PETITIONER
NO. 5:10CV00173 SWW/HDY
RAY HOBBS, Interim Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction
Petitioner Frank R. Garner ("Garner") commenced this proceeding by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. In the petition, he advanced the following claim: "[Petitioner's] right to [a] direct appeal was violated by [the] Arkansas Supreme Court's denial of [a] belated appeal caused by ineffective assistance of counsel." See Document 1 at 5. Respondent Ray Hobbs ("Hobbs") has now filed a response to the petition. In the response, he maintained that Garner's petition should be dismissed because it is "time barred, [or] in the alternative, his claim either fails to form a basis for federal habeas relief or is procedurally defaulted." See
Document 7 at 4. Before giving serious consideration to Hobbs' assertions, the Court invites Garner to file a reply in which he addresses the aforementioned assertions. Garner is given up to, and including, August 6, 2010, to file a reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED this
day of July, 2010.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?