Roberts v. Hobbs et al

Filing 148

ORDER re 142 Order. The newly produced records attached to this Order will not be admitted into evidence, nor may they be used for impeachment. This ruling is without prejudice to the defts' revisiting the issue. Roberts will not be allowed to cross-examine witnesses about the lack of additional sanitation logs and rosters. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/7/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BRUNSON ROBERTS, ADC #127841 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:10-cv-174-DPM DEFENDANTS RODERICK JOHNSON and RICKY WEBB ORDER For the reasons stated on the record at the end of the 6 March 2013 telephone hearing, the newly produced records, Document No. 142, at 3-20, will not be admitted in evidence. They may not be used for impeachment either; they are rebuttal evidence, which likewise should have been produced sooner. This last ruling, though, is without prejudice to the Defendants' revisiting the issue if they find authority beyond Harris and like cases. Given the inadvertent failure to produce the records earlier, and the fact that they do exist, Roberts will not be allowed to cross-examine witnesses about the lack of additional sanitation logs and rosters. So Ordered. D.P. MarBhalif;' United States District Judge 7March2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?