Soto v. Hobbs et al

Filing 88

ORDER ADOPTING 83 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting in part 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against defts Hobbs, May, Harris, Banks, Golden, Evans, Johnson, Boultinghouse, Tate, Jones, and Meinzer are dismiss ed without prejudice. Defts' motion for summary judgment is denied in part, with respect to plaintiff's allegations against deft Dial. Counsel will be appointed by separate Order, and at that time, he will have the opportunity to move to amend plaintiff's complaint, if appropriate. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/7/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ROBERT SOTO, ADC #128324 PLAINTIFF 5:10-cv-00212-JMM-JTK RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 79) is GRANTED in part, with respect to Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendants Hobbs, May, Harris, Banks, Golden, Evans, Johnson, Boultinghouse, Tate, Jones, and Meinzer. 2. Plaintiff’s claims against those Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 79) is DENIED in part, with respect to Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendant Dial. 4. Sufficient evidence exists to present Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against Defendant Dial to a jury, and this case is ready to be set for trial. 5. Counsel will be appointed for Plaintiff by separate Order, and at that time, be provided the opportunity to move to amend Plaintiff’s Complaint, if appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 day of November , 2011. ____________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?