Soto v. Hobbs et al

Filing 96

ORDER granting 92 Motion for Reconsideration re 88 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. After making a de novo review of the record, the Court affirms its November 7, 2011 decision to adopt the Magistrate Judge's Partial Report and Recommendation, which denied Defendant Dial's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/22/11. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

ROBERT SOTO, ADC #128324

V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:10CV00212 JMM

RAY HOBBS, ET AL.

DEFENDANT

ORDER
For good cause shown, Defendant Nicholas Dial’s Motion for Reconsideration to
consider his objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Partial Report and Recommendation
is granted (#92).
After carefully considering Defendant Dial’s objections, the transcript of the pre-jury

hearing held on September 16, 2011, and the Magistrate Judge’s October 27, 2011 Partial Report
and Recommendation, and after making a de novo review of the record, the Court affirms its
November 07, 2011 decision to adopt the Magistrate Judge’s Partial Report and
Recommendation which denied Defendant Dial’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22

day of November , 2011.

James M. Moody
United States District Judge