Madden v. Deen et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED AS MOOT; this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three strikes rule set forth in 28 USC 1915(g); if pltf wishes to continue with this case, he must within 30 days of the entry of this Order submit the $350 filing fee along with a motion to reopen case; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/30/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Madden v. Deen et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION LEE MADDEN ADC #136534 v. No. 5:10CV00215 JLH/JTR DEFENDANTS ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. MOOT. 2. The case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to the three strikes rule Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (docket entry #4) is DENIED, AS PLAINTIFF THOMAS DEEN, Prosecuting Attorney, Tenth Judicial District, et al. set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). 3. If Plaintiff wishes to continue with this case, he must, within thirty days of the entry of this Order: (a) pay the $350 filing fee in full; and (b) file a Motion to Reopen the case. 4. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 30th day of August, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?