Staley v. May et al
ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is dismissed and the dismissal counts as a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/18/10. (vjt)
Staley v. May et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ALBERT J. STALEY, ADC #144308 v. LARRY D. MAY, et al. ORDE R The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, and that dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2010. No. 5:10CV00249 JLH-JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that: "In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted . . . ."
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?