Sanders v. Hobbs et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915 (g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/22/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Sanders v. Hobbs et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION COREY BRIAN SANDERS ADC #113737 v. No. 5:10CV00281 JLH/JTR DEFENDANTS ORDE R The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. 1915A, this case is PLAINTIFF ARTIS RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 2. 1915(g). 3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 22nd day of October, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?