Stricklin v. Kelley et al

Filing 80

ORDER directing the Clerk to re-issue summons for deft Mehta (ADDRESS UNDER SEAL), and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaints 2 7 , and this Order on deft without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/6/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JOSHUA STRICKLIN ADC #138119 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 5:10CV00348 SWW/HDY WENDY KELLEY et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff filed this complaint on December 6, 2010, and service was ordered. On July 1, 2011, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendant Mehta (docket entry #79). Service had been attempted in the care of counsel for the Arkansas Department of Correction’s medical contractor. Although the summons was returned unexecuted, Mehta’s last known address was provided and filed under seal. Accordingly, service will be attempted at that address. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Mehta’s last known addresses shall not be made part of any public record. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a summons for Mehta, and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint (docket entry #2), amended complaint (docket entry #7), and this order, on Mehta, at the addresses provided under seal, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. 3. Upon re-issuance of the summons and complaint, the United States Marshal is hereby directed to send Plaintiff’s copy of process to the Clerk of the Court, who shall then remove the address prior to forwarding a copy to Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6 day of July, 2011. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?