Caradine v. Hobbs
ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; the requested relief is denied and any pending motions are denied as moot 10 11 18 22 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/29/11. (vjt)
Caradine v. Hobbs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WILLIAM F. CARADINE, II ADC #90785 v. No. 5:10CV00351 JLH-JJV PETITIONER
RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the parties' objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which Caradine has made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Caradine's Petition (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED. The requested relief is denied and any pending motions are denied as moot.
Caradine says that the Rule 37 petition that he erroneously sent to the Lincoln Court was returned three and a half weeks later rather than three and a half days later, but that difference does not alter the outcome here.
DATED this 29th day of March, 2011.
J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?