Baker v. Warren et al
Filing
55
ORDER re 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Estella Murray, Handley, William Warren. Plaintiff shall file a response to defts' motion for summary judgment within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/26/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TERRANCE N. BAKER,
ADC #117095
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:11-cv-00001-BSM-JTK
WILLIAM WARREN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
49). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to respond to this
Court's Order may result in the dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiff's Complaint for failure
to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2011.
____________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?