Conway v. Page et al
ORDER denying pltf's 13 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/9/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BYRON L. CONWAY
NO: 5:11CV00010 BSM/HDY
JOE PAGE, III et al.
Plaintiff Byron L. Conway, currently incarcerated at the Grimes Unit of the Arkansas
Department of Correction (“ADC”), filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on
January 19, 2011, making claims in connection with allegations that he was denied timely access
to his mattress, despite his medical problems. On April 5, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel,
seeking answers to interrogatory #8, and request for production #1, which were directed to
Defendant Joe Page, III (docket entry #13). Defendants filed a response in opposition on April 19,
2011 (docket entry #17).
In his requests, Plaintiff seeks a copy of “post order requirements” which are apparently
written directives providing guidance for prison staff members. Defendants have objected on
security and relevance grounds. Because it appears that Defendants’ objections are valid, Plaintiff’s
motion (docket entry #13) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this
day of May, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?