Conway v. Page et al
ORDER that all of pltf's proposed witnesses are denied 29 ; the ADC is directed to ensure pltf's attendance, along with his institutional and medical records, at the hearing scheduled for 10/18/11 in Little Rock. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/23/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BYRON L. CONWAY
NO: 5:11CV00010 BSM/HDY
JOE PAGE, III et al.
In response to the Court's order of May 6, 2011 (docket entry #19), and in anticipation of the
pre-jury evidentiary hearing scheduled for October 18, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., in Room #2B, of the
Richard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock, Arkansas; Plaintiff has submitted
a proposed witness list requesting four witnesses other than himself (docket entry #29). The Court
notes that the evidentiary hearing to be conducted is limited in scope. Due to this limited scope, the
Court concludes that Plaintiff’s requested witnesses should be denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Due to the limited nature of the evidentiary hearing, all of Plaintiff’s proposed
witnesses are denied.
The Arkansas Department of Correction is directed to ensure Plaintiff's attendance
at the hearing, and to bring Plaintiff's institutional and medical records to the hearing.
day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?