Butler v. May et al
Filing
90
ORDER directing pltf to submit the $345.83 outstanding balance of his $350 filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application (enclosed), and file it, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/17/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL BUTLER
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO: 5:11CV00012 KGB/HDY
LARRY MAY et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff Michael Butler, a former inmate at the Arkansas Department of Correction, filed
this pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on January 18, 2011, and was granted leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). On July 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed
a change of address notice which indicates that he has now been released from custody (docket entry
#89).
When a plaintiff is released from confinement, the Court’s policy is to require re-submission
of affidavits to determine whether he should be required to pay all, or a portion of, the fees and costs
of the lawsuit. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, he is directed pay the $345.83
outstanding balance of his $350.00 filing fee, or to resubmit an IFP application which reflects his
free-world financial status, no later than 30 days after the entry date of this order. Plaintiff’s failure
to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of this lawsuit.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Clerk is directed to forward an IFP application to Plaintiff.
2.
Plaintiff is directed to submit the $345.83 outstanding balance of his $350.00
statutory filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days after
the entry date of this order. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of
1
his complaint.
DATED this
17
day of July, 2012.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?