Muldrow v. Harrison et al
Filing
38
ORDER: Because Plaintiff has failed to keep the Clerk informed of his current address, Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/6/2012. (srw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
VEOTIS MULDROW
ADC # 123054
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:11-cv-00013-JJV
STEPHANIE HARRISON, Head Jailer,
Dumas City Jail; DUMAS CITY JAIL
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Since September 22, 2011, all mail sent to Plaintiff by the Court has been returned to sender.
On December 5, 2011, Defendant Harris filed a Notice of Returned Mail (Doc. No. 36) informing
the Court that her First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents mailed to
Plaintiff at his address of record had twice been returned.
As of today’s date, Plaintiff’s
whereabouts remain unknown. At the inception of this case, the Court notified Plaintiff of his
obligation to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c) – informing the Clerk of any change of address – and
that failure to do so could result in the case being dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. No. 12).
Because Plaintiff has failed to keep the Clerk informed of his current address, Plaintiff’s
Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2012.
_______________________________
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?