Boyle v. Lay et al
ORDER ADOPTING 66 Partial Report and Recommendations granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defts Lay and Robertson are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive force claim against defts Earl and Fitzpatrick in their individual capacities only. The Court certifies an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/6/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Warden, Cummins Unit,
Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No
objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #57) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Defendants Lay and Robertson are DISMISSED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies against
Plaintiff may PROCEED with his excessive force claim against
Defendants Earl and Fitzpatrick in their individual capacities only.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 6th day of March, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?