Williams v. Smallwood et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; if pltf wishes to continue this case, he must submit the $350 filing fee within 10 days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/4/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
Williams v. Smallwood et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION THELMA WILLIAMS, JR., ADC #93197 v. 5:11-cv-00015-SWW-JTK DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and PLAINTIFF BARBARA SMALLWOOD, et al. recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $350 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment is not in good faith. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2011. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?