Campbell v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al

Filing 79

ORDER re 76 , 77 , 78 , the Court directs the Plaintiff to file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Jugments and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts on or before 04/14/2012. Defendants may, if they choose, file a Reply within 7 days of the filing of the Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/03/2012. (kcs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARK E. CAMPBELL, ADC #144234 V. PLAINTIFF 5:11CV00021 JLH/JTR GRANT HARRIS, Former Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, a Brief in Support, and a Statement of Undisputed Facts. See docket entries #76, #77, and #78. The Court concludes that a Response from Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, is necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff also must file a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that lists: (a) any disagreement he has with the specifically numbered factual assertions contained in Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts; and (b) any other disputed facts that he believes must be resolved at trial.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1 Specifically, Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts contains 75 separately numbered paragraphs. See docket entry #78. Plaintiff’s Statement of Disputed Facts must contain 75 separately listed paragraphs that respond directly to each of Defendants’ corresponding paragraphs. 1. Plaintiff must file a Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgments and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts on or before April 14, 2012.2 2. Defendants may, if they so choose, file a Reply within seven days of the filing of the Response. Dated this 3rd day of April, 2012. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 See Local Rules 7.2(b) and 56.1(d) (imposing a 14 day deadline for filing a Response and a 7 day deadline for filing a Reply). -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?