Bailey v. Hobbs et al
ORDER granting pltf's 19 motion to dismiss John Doe Defendant; pltf's claims against Doe defendant are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/23/11. (vjt)
-BD Bailey v. Hobbs et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DARRELL BAILEY, ADC #800039 v. RAY HOBBS, et al. ORDER Plaintiff Darrell Bailey filed this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Defendants violated his due process rights. He named John Doe, Classification Administrator, as a defendant. Mr. Bailey was ordered to identify and serve the John Doe defendant on or before June 8, 2011. On March 3, 2011, Mr. Bailey filed a document purporting to identify the Doe Defendant, but the individual's name was illegible. Therefore, Mr. Bailey was ordered to file another amended complaint that legibly identified the John Doe Defendant. Mr. Bailey now has filed a motion to dismiss the John Doe Defendant because he cannot identify this Defendant and no longer wants to proceed against this person. For good cause, Mr. Bailey's motion (#19) is GRANTED, and his claims against the John Doe Defendant are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of March, 2011. Case No. 5:11CV00031 JLH-BD DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?