Rodriguez v. Hobbs
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 dismissing the case and denying the certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/24/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ
VS.
PETITIONER
CASE NO. 5:11CV00032 JMM
RAY HOBBS, Director of the
Arkansas Department of Correction
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate
Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court
concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered
accordingly.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases
in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate
of appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue
only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a
substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability
is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24
day of
June , 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?