Miller v. Holman et al
ORDER approving and adopting 112 Report and Recommendations; granting 95 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing 2 Complaint without prejudice; and certifying that an informa pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/4/2012. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MELTON LEE MILLER
NO: 5:11CV00057 JMM
KAREN HOLMAN et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed.1 After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #95) is GRANTED, and
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 4th day of December, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court will interpret Plaintiff’s twenty-two page pleading docketed as Plaintiff’s
declaration at docket entry 113 as his objections to the Recommended Disposition.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?