Foley v. Hobbs

Filing 10

ORDER directing the Petitioner to file a Reply, on or before July 11, 2011, advising whether he filed a notice of appeal of the denial of his Rule 37 petition in Pulaski County Circuit Case No. 2008-2880. If he filed a notice of appeal, he should attach a copy to his Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 06/27/2011. (ksm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES LEE FOLEY ADC #79350 VS. PETITIONER 5:11CV00065 SWW/JTR RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER Respondent has filed a Response (docket entry #9) asserting, among other things, that this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice as a “mixed” petition containing some claims that Petitioner has not exhausted in state court (his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel) and some that he has exhausted (his prosecutorial misconduct claims). On May 24, 2011, the Pulaski County Circuit Court denied Petitioner’s Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 petition for post-conviction relief in Case No. CR 2008-2880 and, when the Response was filed in this federal habeas action, the time had not expired for Petitioner to file a notice of appeal of the denial. See Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 2(a)(4) (notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days from entry of order denying Rule 37 petition). It appears that the appeal time has now expired, and the website for the Pulaski County Circuit Court does not indicate that a notice of appeal has been filed. -1- Petitioner is directed to file a Reply, on or before July 11, 2011, advising whether he filed a notice of appeal of the denial of his Rule 37 petition in Pulaski County Circuit Court Case No. 2008-2880. If he filed a notice of appeal, he should attach a copy to his Reply. DATED THIS 27th DAY OF June, 2011. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?