Pennington v. Straughn et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this Court's April 1, 2011 Order 5 granting pltf's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is REVOKED, and pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any monies deducted from pltf's inmate account pursuant to the April 1, 2011 Order, be refunded to pltf's account; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/26/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
FREDERICK PENNINGTON,
ADC #71305
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:11CV00073 JLH-JTK
WILLIAM STRAUGHN, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.
After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this Court’s April 1, 2011 Order granting Plaintiff’s
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is REVOKED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED
without prejudice.
Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he shall submit the statutory filing fee of $350
to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order,
along with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will
be reopened.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any monies deducted from Plaintiff’s inmate account
pursuant to the April 1, 2011 Order, be refunded to Plaintiff’s account.
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of May, 2011.
___________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?