Anderson v. Hubbard et al
ORDER ADOPTING 53 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, deft Lytle's Motion to Dismiss 40 is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; pltf's request to file an amended complaint 52 is DENIED; pltf's motion for extension of time to file objections 55 is moot. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/2/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
THEODORE A. ANDERSON,
CONNIE HUBBARD, LPN,
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed
objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review
of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Separate Defendant Lytle’s Motion to Dismiss (docket entry #40) is
GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff’s request to file a Second Amended Complaint (which was
contained in his Response to the Motion to Dismiss, docket entry #49) is DENIED.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommended Partial
Disposition would not be taken in good faith.
4. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file objections (docket entry
# 55) is moot, as the Court has considered the objections filed.
Dated this 2nd day of December, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?