Reed v. Anderson et al
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file within thirty days of the entry of this Order, a Response and a Statement of Disputed Material Facts that comply with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order, re docket entries # 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment, # 17 Brief in Support and # 18 Statement of Facts (Local Rule 56.1) filed by Richard Reed, Roland Anderson, Juanita Stell. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 07/05/2011. (ksm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DR. ROLAND ANDERSON, Director,
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et al.
On July 1, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, a Brief in
Support, and a Statement of Undisputed Facts. See docket entries #16, #17, and #18.
The Court concludes that a Response from Plaintiff would be helpful to the resolution
of that Motion.
At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations
and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). This means that
Plaintiff’s Response must include his legal arguments, as well as affidavits,1 prison
records, or other evidence establishing that there is a genuine issue of material fact
that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.
The affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person
executing the affidavit and must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary
public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
Furthermore, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff must also separately file a
Statement of Disputed Material Facts, which lists: (a) any disagreement he has with
the specifically numbered factual assertions contained in Defendants’ Statement of
Undisputed Facts (docket entry #18); and (b) any other disputed facts that he believes
must be resolved at a hearing or trial.2
Finally, Plaintiff is advised that if he intends to rely upon grievances or records
that have been previously filed with the Court, he must specifically refer to those
documents by docket number, page, date, and heading. The Court will not sift
through the file to find support for Plaintiff’s factual contentions. See Crossley v.
Georgia-Pacific, Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004) (affirming the grant
of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages of
the record that supported his position).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff shall file, within thirty days of the entry of the Order, a
Response and a Statement of Disputed Material Facts that comply with the Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order.
Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with
If Plaintiff disputes any of the facts set forth in Defendants’ Statement of
Undisputed Facts, he must identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts
he disputes and, for each paragraph, explain why he disputes those facts.
this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts set forth in Defendants’ summary judgment
papers being deemed admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); or (b) the
dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
Dated this 5th day of July, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?