Reed v. Anderson et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 and granting 30 Motion to Dismiss filed by Richard Reed. 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Edward Jackson, Roland Anderson, Juanita Stell is denied as moot. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice and an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/7/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RICHARD REED ADC# 110264 v. PLAINTIFF No.5:11-cv-111-DPM DR. ROLAND ANDERSON, JUANITA STELL, and EDWARD JACKSON DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No. 32. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. elV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Reed's motion to dismiss, Document No. 30, granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Document No. 16, denied as moot. Reed's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?