Reed v. Anderson et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 and granting 30 Motion to Dismiss filed by Richard Reed. 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Edward Jackson, Roland Anderson, Juanita Stell is denied as moot. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice and an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/7/11. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

RICHARD REED

ADC# 110264

v.

PLAINTIFF

No.5:11-cv-111-DPM

DR. ROLAND ANDERSON,
JUANITA STELL, and EDWARD
JACKSON

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No. 32. No one has
objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of
the record, FED. R. elV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition),
and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Reed's motion
to dismiss, Document No. 30, granted. Defendants' motion for summary
judgment, Document No. 16, denied as moot. Reed's complaint is dismissed
without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

-2­