Whitaker v. Hobbs et al
Filing
11
ORDER adopting 6 Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as its own, except for the citation to the unpublished Sanders v. Norris opinion and to Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, which is an Americans with Disabilities Act case. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/28/2011. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
GERALD WHITAKER
ADC# 141195
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:11-cv-117-DPM
RAY HOBBS, DELTA REGIONAL
UNIT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL
SERVICES, GAYLON LAY, and
MARK CASHION
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No.6. The Court granted
Whitaker additional time to file objections, but he has not done so. Document
No.9. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the
record, FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and
for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own, except for the citation
to the unpublished Sanders v. Norris opinion and to Walker v. Missouri
Department of Corrections, which is an Americans with Disabilities Act case.
Whitaker's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
This dismissal
constitutes a strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies
II
that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying
Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
.
II
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?