Whitaker v. Hobbs et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 6 Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as its own, except for the citation to the unpublished Sanders v. Norris opinion and to Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, which is an Americans with Disabilities Act case. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/28/2011. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION GERALD WHITAKER ADC# 141195 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:11-cv-117-DPM RAY HOBBS, DELTA REGIONAL UNIT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, GAYLON LAY, and MARK CASHION DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No.6. The Court granted Whitaker additional time to file objections, but he has not done so. Document No.9. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own, except for the citation to the unpublished Sanders v. Norris opinion and to Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, which is an Americans with Disabilities Act case. Whitaker's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies II that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. . II D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?