Wooden/Hall v. Meinzer et al
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Partial Report and Recommendations, except for the citation to the unpublished McClinton opinion, and dismissing plaintiff's retaliation claims against defts Meinzer and Ramey without prejudice. His claim against Meinzer for violation of ADC policy and procedures is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CURTIS MEINZER and RAMEY
The Court has reviewed the partial recommended disposition from U.5.
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere, Document No.8, and Defendant Wooden/Hall's
objections, Document No. 13. Having conducted a de novo review of the record,
the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's proposal as its own, except for the
citation to the unpublished McClinton opinion.
R. CN. P. 72(b)(3).
Wooden/Hall's retaliation claims against Meinzer and Ramey are
dismissed without prejudice. His claim against Meinzer for violation of ADC
policy and procedures is dismissed with prejudice.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?