Kelley v. Anderson et al
ORDER denying pltf's Motions 43 to Appoint Counsel and 44 for Medical Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/22/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NO: 5:11CV00130 SWW/HDY
ROLAND ANDERSON et al.
On September 21, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel, and a motion
seeking an order directing his transport for medical testing to determine the cause of his anal
bleeding that is at issue in this lawsuit (docket entries #43 & #44). Plaintiff’s prior motion for
appointment of counsel was denied (docket entry #34), and Plaintiff has offered no facts or law to
cause the Court to believe that decision should be modified. Although Plaintiff seeks an order
directing a medical evaluation to determine the cause of his bleeding and treatment options,
according to the complaint, he has already had various examinations, including a colonoscopy on
April 20, 2011. Plaintiff may review his medical records and seek to introduce them at any
proceeding held in this matter, and another medical evaluation is not necessary at this time.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel
(docket entry #43) and for a medical evaluation (docket entry #44) are DENIED.
day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?