Alexander/Ryahim v. Hobbs et al

Filing 142

ORDER adopting 89 Partial Report and Recommendations; denying 77 Motion for Order to Show Cause; and, denying 74 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/27/2012. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CHARLES E. ALEXANDERjRYAHIM, JR. ADC # 111057 v. PLAINTIFF No.5:11-cv-133-DPM-BD RAY HOBBS, Director Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's proposed Partial Recommended Disposition, Document No. 89, and Charles Alexander/Ryahim's several objections, briefs, and addenda, Document Nos. 93, 97, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 105, 106, 110, 111, 112, 132, 137, 140, & 141. Having conducted a de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Deere's proposal as its own. FED. R. ClV. P. 72(b)(3). Mr. Alexander/Ryahim's motion to amend his complaint, Document No. 74, and his motion for order to show cause, Document No. 77, are denied. The Court cautions Mr. Alexander/Ryahim. One objection to any of Judge Deere's rulings is sufficient. Filing more than a dozen addenda (or other papers) supplementing an objection-as Mr. Alexander/Ryahim has done here on Document No. 93 - is excessive. It abuses the judicial process. HMr. AlexanderjRyahimcontinues this pattern of excessive filings, the Court will consider sanctions, such as directing the Clerk to reject proposed filings. So Ordered. Z/ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?