Alexander/Ryahim v. Hobbs et al

Filing 142

ORDER adopting 89 Partial Report and Recommendations; denying 77 Motion for Order to Show Cause; and, denying 74 Motion to Amend. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/27/2012. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

PINE BLUFF DIVISION

CHARLES E. ALEXANDERjRYAHIM, JR.

ADC # 111057

v.

PLAINTIFF

No.5:11-cv-133-DPM-BD

RAY HOBBS, Director Arkansas
Department of Correction, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's proposed
Partial Recommended Disposition, Document No.

89, and Charles

Alexander/Ryahim's several objections, briefs, and addenda, Document Nos.
93, 97, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 105, 106, 110, 111, 112, 132, 137, 140, & 141.
Having conducted a de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Deere's proposal
as its own. FED. R. ClV. P. 72(b)(3). Mr. Alexander/Ryahim's motion to
amend his complaint, Document No. 74, and his motion for order to show
cause, Document No. 77, are denied.
The Court cautions Mr. Alexander/Ryahim. One objection to any of
Judge Deere's rulings is sufficient. Filing more than a dozen addenda (or
other papers) supplementing an objection-as Mr. Alexander/Ryahim has
done here on Document No. 93 - is excessive. It abuses the judicial process.

HMr. AlexanderjRyahimcontinues this pattern of excessive filings, the Court
will consider sanctions, such as directing the Clerk to reject proposed filings.
So Ordered.

Z/

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

-2­