Alexander/Ryahim v. Hobbs et al

Filing 195

ORDER adopting 192 Recommended Disposition as the Court's decision; granting 179 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing the complaint with prejudice, and granting 194 Plaintiff's Motion for Copies. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/18/2012. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHARLES E. ALEXANDER-RYAHIM, JR.
ADC # 111057

v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:11-cv-133-DPM-BD

RAY HOBBS; WILLIAM STRAUGHN;
ANDRAE CAMPBELL; LEROY BROWNLEE;
RANDAL MANUS; CRYSTAL WOODS;
and VANITA KING

DEFENDANTS

ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's proposed
Recommended Disposition, Document No. 192, and Alexander-Ryahim' s
objections, Document No. 193. Alexander-Ryahim' s objections, though
comprehensive, do not address his failure to state a claim for retaliation. He
has still not shown that prison officials disciplined him for exercising a
constitutionally protected right. Meuir v. Green County Jail Employees, 487
F.3d 1115, 1119 (8th Cir. 2007). On de novo review, the Court adopts Judge
Deere's proposal as its decision. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Document No. 179, granted.
Alexander-Ryahim' s complaint, Document No. 1, dismissed with prejudice.
His motion for copies, Document No. 194, is granted.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge