Brown v. Dumas City Jail
ORDER adopting and approving in their entirety 16 Proposed Findngs and Recommended Disposition; dismissing this case without prejudice; and, certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/16/2011. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PATRICK I. BROWN,
DUMAS CITY JAIL
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have
been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this
case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which
relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a “strike,” as defined by 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not
be taken in good faith.
Dated this 16th day of August,2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?