Brown v. Dumas City Jail

Filing 17

ORDER adopting and approving in their entirety 16 Proposed Findngs and Recommended Disposition; dismissing this case without prejudice; and, certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/16/2011. (dmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

PATRICK I. BROWN,
ADC #116384
V.

PLAINTIFF
5:11CV00135 JMM/JTR

DUMAS CITY JAIL

DEFENDANT
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have
been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this

case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which
relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a “strike,” as defined by 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in

forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not
be taken in good faith.
Dated this 16th day of August,2011.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE