Davis v. Montgomery et al
ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing this case without predudice for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action constitutes as a strike and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/15/11. (pag)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WILLIE GASTER DAVIS, JR.,
No. 5:11CV00150 JLH/JTR
BARBARA A. MONTGOMERY,
Sergeant, Maximum Security Unit, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering
these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that
the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is
DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a “strike,” as defined by 28 U.S.C.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 15th day of July, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?