Robinson v. White et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT : Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal constitutes a stri ke, as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/5/11. (hph)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RICHARD DARNELL ROBINSON,
ADC #147187
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:11CV00167 JLH/JTR

SUMNER, Lieutenant,
Diagnostic Unit, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and
ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal constitutes a “strike,” as defined by 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 5th day of August, 2011.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE