Robinson v. White et al

Filing 9

ORDER approving and adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing this case without prejudice. Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a strike, as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/5/11. (hph)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RICHARD DARNELL ROBINSON,
ADC #147187
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:11CV00167 JLH/JTR

SUMNER, Lieutenant,
Diagnostic Unit, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful
review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is

DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a “strike,” as defined by 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).
3.

The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 5th day of August, 2011.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE