Harris v. Hobbs
ORDER that Petitioner is directed to file, on or before September 19, 2011, a Reply addressing the arguments raised in Respondent's Response for dismissal, (docket entry #6). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 08/18/2011. (kcs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ANDRE J. HARRIS
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
Respondent has filed a Response (docket entry #6) arguing that Petitioner’s 28
U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition is untimely under the one-year statute of limitations set
forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Alternatively, Respondent argues that Petitioner’s
claims are procedurally defaulted because he failed to first raise them in a proper and
timely state court post-conviction proceeding. A Reply to the Response would be
helpful to resolution of this action.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Petitioner is directed to file, on or
before September 19, 2011, a Reply addressing these arguments for dismissal.
DATED THIS 18th DAY OF August, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?