Stewart et al v. Conrad et al

Filing 112

ORDER due to the limited nature of the evidentiary hearing, all of pltf's proposed witnesses are denied 92 ; the ADC is directed to ensure pltf's attendance and his institutional and medical records at the hearing scheduled for 3/5/12. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 2/29/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RHONDA KAY STEWART et al.
V.

PLAINTIFFS

NO: 5:11CV00179 JMM/HDY

SHERRY A. CONRAD et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

In response to the Court's order of December 1, 2011 (docket entry #88), and in anticipation
of the pre-jury evidentiary hearing scheduled for March 5, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Room #2B, of the
Richard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock, Arkansas; Plaintiff has submitted
a proposed witness list requesting six witnesses other than himself (docket entry #92). The Court
notes that the evidentiary hearing to be conducted is limited in scope. Due to this limited scope, the
Court concludes that Plaintiff’s requested witnesses should be denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Due to the limited nature of the evidentiary hearing, all of Plaintiff’s proposed

witnesses are denied.
2.

The Arkansas Department of Correction is directed to ensure Plaintiff's attendance

at the hearing, and to bring Plaintiff's institutional and medical records to the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 29

day of February, 2012.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE