Stewart et al v. Conrad et al

Filing 112

ORDER due to the limited nature of the evidentiary hearing, all of pltf's proposed witnesses are denied 92 ; the ADC is directed to ensure pltf's attendance and his institutional and medical records at the hearing scheduled for 3/5/12. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 2/29/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RHONDA KAY STEWART et al. V. PLAINTIFFS NO: 5:11CV00179 JMM/HDY SHERRY A. CONRAD et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER In response to the Court's order of December 1, 2011 (docket entry #88), and in anticipation of the pre-jury evidentiary hearing scheduled for March 5, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Room #2B, of the Richard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock, Arkansas; Plaintiff has submitted a proposed witness list requesting six witnesses other than himself (docket entry #92). The Court notes that the evidentiary hearing to be conducted is limited in scope. Due to this limited scope, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s requested witnesses should be denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Due to the limited nature of the evidentiary hearing, all of Plaintiff’s proposed witnesses are denied. 2. The Arkansas Department of Correction is directed to ensure Plaintiff's attendance at the hearing, and to bring Plaintiff's institutional and medical records to the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29 day of February, 2012. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?