Stewart et al v. Conrad et al
ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, complaint 1 , motion for TRO 15 , declaration 16 , and this Order on deft Tammy K. Rochelle (ADDRESS UNDER SEAL), without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/14/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RHONDA KAY STEWART et al.
NO: 5:11CV00179 JMM/HDY
SHERRY A. CONRAD et al.
Plaintiff Terrance Proctor filed this complaint on July 12, 2011, and service was ordered.1
On September 14, 2011, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendant Tammy K. Rochelle
(docket entry #35). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of
Correction, but was returned because Rochelle is no longer employed there. However, Rochelle’s
last known address was provided and filed under seal. Accordingly, service will be attempted at that
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Rochelle’s last known address shall not be made part of any public record.
The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a summons for Rochelle, and the United States
Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint (docket entry #1), motion
for a temporary restraining order and declaration (docket entries #15 & #16), and this order, on
Rochelle, at the addresses provided under seal, without prepayment of fees and costs or security
Upon re-issuance of the summons and complaint, the United States Marshal is hereby
This case originally had a number of other Plaintiff in addition to Terrance Proctor.
However, the claims of all other Plaintiffs were dismissed by United States District Judge James M.
Moody on September 12, 2011.
directed to send Plaintiff’s copy of process to the Clerk of the Court, who shall then remove
Rochelle’s address prior to forwarding a copy to Plaintiff.
day of September, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?