Webb v. Engstrom et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 32 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court's Order; all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT 17 30 . Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/30/12. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BRIAN J. WEBB
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 5:11CV00191 JLH

EDWARD ENGSTROM, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply

with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and for failure to respond to the Court’s order.
2.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
3.

All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED this 30th day of March, 2012.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE